PETER A. PRIMEAU, PETITIONER,

v.

OHIO.

Citator

Cited By

• Hess v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 175 So. 3d 687 (Fla. 2015)
  …against the Engle defendants resolved all elements of the claims that had anything to do with the Engle defendants’ cigarettes or their conduct.” Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas, 110 So. 3d 419, 432 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 332, 187 L.Ed.2d 158 (2013). “[T]he Phase I findings establish the Engle defendants’ common liability for the strict liability, negligence, breach of express and implied warranty, fraudulent concealment, and conspiracy to fraudulently conceal claims alleged by the Engle…
• R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Hiott, 129 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
  …5 U.S. 276, 299, 25 S.Ct. 58, 49 L.Ed. 193 (1904). Reynolds acknowledges that its argument has been rejected by the Florida Supreme Court in Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas, 110 So. 3d 419 (Fla.2013), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 332, [*479] 187 L.Ed.2d 158 (2013), but seeks to preserve it for further review. We reject this argument and affirm on the authority of Douglas. Cross-Appeal Standard of Review On cross-appeal, Hiott asserts she is entitled to the full award of damages, despite the jury’s f…
• Vila v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 215 So. 3d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
  …rgument was rejected by the Florida Supreme Court in Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas, 110 So. 3d 419 (Fla.2013), and the Supreme Court of the United States has denied review of Douglas. Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 332, 187 L.Ed.2d 158 (2013) (denying certiorari). Accordingly, we affirm the cross-appeal without further discussion. . Shortly after moving to the Dominican Republic, Vila and his family moved to Costa Rica for approximately a year, but returned to the Dominican Repub…