DORIS R. FREDERICK, APPELLANT,

v.

WILLIAM H. FREDERICK, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (27 total)

• DE LA Rosa v. Zequeira, 659 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 1995)
  …d DCA 1993), based on conflict with Mitchell v. State, 458 [*240] So. 2d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), Mobil Chemical Company v. Hawkins, 440 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), review denied, 449 So. 2d 264 (Fla.1984), and Skiles v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 267 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972), cert. denied, 275 So. 2d 253 (Fla.1973). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We quash the Third District’s decision with instructions to reinstate the trial court’s order granting a new trial because a juror fail…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Bernal v. Donald H. Lipp, D.P.M. & Donald H. Lipp, D.P.M., P.A., 580 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
  …s to whether a juror should be challenged....” Minnis v. Jackson, 330 So. 2d 847, 848 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Since the information was squarely asked for and was not provided, this branch of the test is satisfied. See Skiles v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 267 So. 2d 379, 382 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972), cert. denied, 275 So. 2d 253 (Fla.1973). Although the juror did not intend to mislead plaintiffs’ counsel, the omission nonetheless prevented counsel from making an informed judgment— [*317] which would in all likelihood hav…
• Jefferson Mitchell v. State, 458 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
  …s to whether a juror should be excused. Counsel have the right to truthful information in making that judgment. See Minnis v. Jackson, 330 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1976); Loftin v. Wilson, 67 So. 2d 185 (Fla.1953); Skiles v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 267 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1972). The state argues that the defendant should be denied relief because the juror’s untruthful response was not intentional. We might abide that argument if, for example, the juror was not aware of her nephew’s employment or the qu…

  ← 1 / 2 →