LEMUEL SESSION WHITESIDE, PETITIONER,

v.

ARKANSAS.

Citator

Cited By

• McCARTHAN v. Warden, FCI Estill, 811 F.3d 1237 (11th Cir. 2016)
  …tates v. Proch, 637 F. 3d 1262, 1265 (11th Cir.2011). On appeal, we review de novo whether crimes were committed on different occasions within the meaning of the ACCA. United States v. Weeks, 711 F. 3d 1255, 1261 (11th Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 311, 187 L.Ed.2d 220 (2013). The crux of the ACCA separate-occasions inquiry focuses on whether a defendant “had a meaningful opportunity to desist his activity [after one offense] before committing the [next] offense.” United States v. Pope, 132 F. 3…
• United States v. Kirk, 767 F.3d 1136 (11th Cir. 2014)
  …for crimes that “otherwise involve[] conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another” is known as the statute’s “residual clause.” Id.; see United States v. Weeks, 711 F. 3d 1255, 1262 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 311, 187 L.Ed.2d 220 (2013). The Supreme Court requires courts to use a “categorical approach” and a “comparative inquiry” to determine whether a crime qualifies as a violent felony under the ACCA’s residual clause. United States v. Petite, 703 F. 3d…