PADGETT LUMBER COMPANY, A CORPORATION, FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PANAMA CITY, A CORPORATION, AND TUCKER BAKER, APPELLANTS,
v.
R. R. HODGES, TRADING AND DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF HODGES LUMBER COMPANY, APPELLEE
The appeal here, is from an order overruling demurrer to an amended bill of complaint. The order appealed from should be affirmed on authority of opinions and judgments in the cases of Douglass et al. vs. State Bank of Orlando, 77 Fla. 830, 82 Sou. 593; East Coast Lumber & Supply Co., vs. Maxwell, 77 Fla. 62; 80 Sou. 741; Cotton States Belting & Supply Co., vs. Fla. Rwy. Co., 69 Fla. 52, 67 Sou. 568; Grand Lodge K of P. vs. State Bank, 79 Fla. 471, 84 Sou. 528 and eases there cited. It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Eppes Tucker, Jr. v. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co., 114 Fla. 469 (Fla. 1934)…Per Curiam. — The decree appealed from in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Evans v. Tucker, 101 Fla. 688, 135 Sou. 305, and it is so ordered. Affirmed. Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.…
-
Builders Fin. Co., Inc. v. Ridgewood Homesites, Inc., 157 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)…real estate at times significant to the proceedings under consideration. For example, see: R. E. L. McCaskill Co., et al. v. Dekle, 88 Fla. 285, 102 So. 252; Sikes, et al. v. Dade Lumber Co., 98 Fla. 451, 123 So. 918; Evans v. Tucker, 101 Fla. 688, 135 So. 305, 85 A.L.R. 170; Shirley v. Lake Butler Corp., 123 So. 2d 267 (Fla.2d Dist.Ct.App.1960). It is common knowledge that most commodities, even real estate, will sell for a smaller aggregate sum when disposed of wholesale rather than by the retail metho…
-
Griffin v. Bolen, 149 Fla. 377 (Fla. 1942)…upra; Horton v. Smith Richardson Inv. Co., supra. 6. The appellants, except those who were innocent purchasers, were guilty of fraud, and were not entitled to recover for the improvements or for the purchase price for the property. Evans v. Tucker, 101 Fla. 688, 135 So. 305. Johns v. Gillian,134 Fla. 575, 164 So. 140. Gilbert v. Hoffman, 26 Amer. Decisions, 103. Warner v. Warner, 191 N.Y.S. 612. 7. The bill of complaint contained a prayer for general relief and under our statutes and present rules of plea…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Cotton States Belting & Supply Co. v. Fla. Ry. Co., 69 Fla. 52 (Fla. 1915)
- Grand Lodge Knights of Pythias of Fla. v. State Bank of Fla., 79 Fla. 471 (Fla. 1920)
- Douglass v. State Bank of Orlando, 77 Fla. 830 (Fla. 1919)
- E. Coast Lumber & Supply Co. v. Maxwell, 77 Fla. 62 (Fla. 1919)