MARIO ANTON LEE, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES.

U.S. | 2013-11-18
No. 13–6815.
134 S. Ct. 655 Supreme Court of the United States (2013) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 187 L. Ed. 2d 461 · 571 U.S. 1031 · 82 U.S.L.W. 3299
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …light most favorable to the non-moving party, “presents no genuine issue of material fact and compels judgment as a matter of law in favor of the moving party.” Owusu-Ansah v. Coca-Cola Co., 715 F. 3d 1306, 1307 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 655, 187 L.Ed.2d 449 (2013). V. QUALIFIED IMMUNITY The defendants assert that that they are not liable under the Eighth Amendment because they are entitled to qualified immunity. “The defense of qualified immunity completely protects government officia…
    1 / 2
  • Wetherbee v. The S. Co., 754 F.3d 901 (11th Cir. 2014)
    …ability status is not an element of §§ 12112(d)(2) and (d)(4)(A) claims. See Harrison v. Benchmark Elecs. Huntsville, Inc., 593 F. 3d 1206, 1213 (11th Cir.2010); Owusu-Ansah v. Coca-Cola Co., 715 F. 3d 1306, 1310 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 655, 187 L.Ed.2d 449 (2013). Accordingly, Wetherbee argues that we should extend the holdings of those cases and hold that disability status is not an element of § 12112(d)(3)(C). We disagree and instead join the Seventh and Tenth Circuits in holding…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw