POM WONDERFUL LLC, PETITIONER,

v.

THE COCA-COLA COMPANY.

Citator

Cited By

• POM Wonderful LLC v. The Coca-Cola Co., 134 S. Ct. 2228 (U.S. 2014)
  …e Court of Appeals barred POM's Lanham Act claim. Id., at 1178. II A This Court granted certiorari to consider whether a private party may bring a Lanham Act claim challenging a food label that is regulated by the FDCA. 571 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 895, 187 L.Ed.2d 701 (2014). The answer to that question is based on the following premises. First, this is not a pre-emption case. In pre-emption cases, the question is whether state law is pre-empted by a federal statute, or in some instances, a federal agency acti…
• Republic OF Argentina v. NML Cap., Ltd., 134 S. Ct. 2250 (U.S. 2014)
  …r involves discovery, not attachment of sovereign property, and because it is directed at third-party banks, not at Argentina itself, Argentina's sovereign immunity is not infringed." Id., at 205. We granted certiorari. 571 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 895, 187 L.Ed.2d 701 (2014). II. Analysis A The rules governing discovery in postjudgment execution proceedings are quite permissive. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69(a)(2) states that, "[i]n aid of the judgment or execution, the judgment creditor ... may obtain dis…
• United States v. Clarke, 134 S. Ct. 2361 (U.S. 2014)
  …als has rejected the Eleventh Circuit's view that a bare allegation of improper motive entitles a person objecting to an IRS summons to examine the responsible officials.2 We granted certiorari to resolve that conflict, 571 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 895, 187 L.Ed.2d 701 (2014), and we now vacate the Eleventh Circuit's opinion. II A person receiving an IRS summons is, as we have often held, entitled to contest it in an enforcement proceeding. See United States v. Bisceglia, 420 U.S. 141, 146, 95 S.Ct. 915, 43 L.Ed.2…