CTS CORPORATION, PETITIONER,

v.

PETER WALDBURGER, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, 134 S. Ct. 2175 (U.S. 2014)
  …, 419 F. 3d 355, 362 (C.A.5 2005), and Clark County v. Sioux Equipment Corp., 2008 S.D. 60, ¶¶ 27-29, 753 N.W. 2d 406, 417, with McDonald v. Sun Oil Co., 548 F. 3d 774, 779 (C.A.9 2008). This Court granted certiorari. 571 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 896, 187 L.Ed.2d 702 (2014). II A The outcome of the case turns on whether § 9658 makes a distinction between state-enacted statutes of limitations and statutes of repose. Statutes of limitations and statutes of repose both are mechanisms used to limit the temporal ex…
• Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2120 (U.S. 2014)
  …of EMG signals." Id., at 906. Other limitations of the claim, in his view, and not the " 'spaced relationship' limitation itself," "included a functional requirement to remove EMG signals." Ibid. We granted certiorari, 571 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 896, 187 L.Ed.2d 702 (2014), and now vacate and remand. [*908] III A Although the parties here disagree on the dispositive question-does the '753 patent withstand definiteness scrutiny-they are in accord on several aspects of the § 112, ¶ 2 inquiry. First, definitenes…