GARY D. HAUGEN, PETITIONER,
v.
JOHN KITZHABER, GOVERNOR OF OREGON.
GARY D. HAUGEN, PETITIONER,
JOHN KITZHABER, GOVERNOR OF OREGON.
134 S. Ct. 1009
Supreme Court of the United States (2014)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 187 L. Ed. 2d 856 · 571 U.S. 1167 · 82 U.S.L.W. 3424
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pinkney Carter v. State, 175 So. 3d 761 (Fla. 2015)…sel had presented such a motion to the court.’ ” Dillbeck v. State, 964 So. 2d 95, 104 (Fla.2007) (quoting Wike v. State, 813 So. 2d 12, 18 (Fla.2002)); see also Taylor v. State, 120 So. 3d 540, 551 (Fla.2013), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 1009, 187 L.Ed.2d 856 (2014). We have explained the standard for a change of venue as follows: Knowledge of the incident because of its notoriety is not, in and of itself, grounds for a change of venue. The test for determining a change of venue is whether the general s…
-
Gonzalez v. State, 253 So. 3d 526 (Fla. 2018)…ed such a motion to the court.' " Dillbeck v. State, 964 So. 2d 95, 104 (Fla. 2007) (quoting Wike v. State, 813 So. 2d 12, 18 (Fla. 2002) ); see also Taylor v. State, 120 So. 3d 540, 551 (Fla. 2013), cert. denied, [571] U.S. [1166], 134 S. Ct. 1009, 187 L.Ed.2d 856 (2014). Carter v. State , 175 So. 3d 761, 776 (Fla. 2015). Logic dictates, then, that where trial counsel did move for a change of venue and was denied, a defendant cannot demonstrate that the trial court would have granted the motion. Furthermore,…