GARY D. HAUGEN, PETITIONER,
v.
JOHN KITZHABER, GOVERNOR OF OREGON.

U.S. | 2014-01-21
No. 13–7487.
134 S. Ct. 1009 Supreme Court of the United States (2014) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 187 L. Ed. 2d 856 · 571 U.S. 1167 · 82 U.S.L.W. 3424
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Pinkney Carter v. State, 175 So. 3d 761 (Fla. 2015)
    …sel had presented such a motion to the court.’ ” Dillbeck v. State, 964 So. 2d 95, 104 (Fla.2007) (quoting Wike v. State, 813 So. 2d 12, 18 (Fla.2002)); see also Taylor v. State, 120 So. 3d 540, 551 (Fla.2013), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 1009, 187 L.Ed.2d 856 (2014). We have explained the standard for a change of venue as follows: Knowledge of the incident because of its notoriety is not, in and of itself, grounds for a change of venue. The test for determining a change of venue is whether the general s…
  • Gonzalez v. State, 253 So. 3d 526 (Fla. 2018)
    …ed such a motion to the court.' " Dillbeck v. State, 964 So. 2d 95, 104 (Fla. 2007) (quoting Wike v. State, 813 So. 2d 12, 18 (Fla. 2002) ); see also Taylor v. State, 120 So. 3d 540, 551 (Fla. 2013), cert. denied, [571] U.S. [1166], 134 S. Ct. 1009, 187 L.Ed.2d 856 (2014). Carter v. State , 175 So. 3d 761, 776 (Fla. 2015). Logic dictates, then, that where trial counsel did move for a change of venue and was denied, a defendant cannot demonstrate that the trial court would have granted the motion. Furthermore,…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw