ARTHUR LEE SAMPSON, A/K/A ARTHUR LEE SIMPSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Sampson, 317 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)…ng that CrPR 3.-191(g) is applicable and because of our interpretation of that rule. Arthur Lee Sampson was adjudicated guilty of murder in the second degree. Upon appeal to this court, the judgment was affirmed. See Sampson v. State, Fla.App.1972, 268 So. 2d 467. He was awarded a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. This last order was appealed to this court and affirmed. See State v. Sampson, Fla.App.1973, 279 So. 2d 370. Upon the expiration of 109 days from the order awarding a new tria…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)