JERRY PAULL, PETITIONER,

v.

UNITED STATES.

Citator

Cited By

• Warger v. Shauers., 135 S. Ct. 521 (U.S. 2014)
  …2 F. 2d 482, 485 (C.A.9 1987)("Statements which tend to show deceit during voir dire are not barred by [Rule 606(b)]"), and Maldonado v. Missouri P.R. Co.,798 F. 2d 764, 770 (C.A.5 1986)(same). We granted certiorari, 571 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 1491, 188 L.Ed.2d 374 (2014), and now affirm. II We hold that Rule 606(b)applies to juror testimony during a proceeding in which a party seeks to secure a new trial on the ground that a juror lied during voir dire. In doing so, we simply accord Rule 606(b)'s terms their…
• Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk, 135 S. Ct. 513 (U.S. 2014)
  …employee theft, the Court of Appeals concluded that the screenings were "necessary" to the employees' primary work as warehouse employees and done for Integrity Staffing's benefit. Id.,at 531. We granted certiorari, 571 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 1490, 188 L.Ed.2d 374 (2014), and now reverse. II A Enacted in 1938, the FLSA established a minimum wage and overtime compensation for each hour worked in excess of 40 hours in each workweek. §§ 6(a)(1), 7(a)(3), 52 Stat. 1062-1063. An employer who violated these provi…
• Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers Dist. Council Constr. Industrypension Fund, 135 S. Ct. 1318 (U.S. 2015)
  …d not need to contend that anyone at Omnicare "disbelieved [the opinion] at the time it was expressed." 719 F.3d, at 506(quoting Fait v. Regions Financial Corp.,655 F.3d 105, 110 (C.A.2 2011)). We granted certiorari, 571 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 1490, 188 L.Ed.2d 374 (2014), to consider how § 11 pertains to statements of opinion. We do so in two steps, corresponding to the two parts of § 11 and the two theories in the Funds' complaint. We initially address the Funds' claim that Omnicare made "untrue statement[s]…