GREGORY P. WARGER, PETITIONER,
v.
RANDY D. SHAUERS.
GREGORY P. WARGER, PETITIONER,
RANDY D. SHAUERS.
134 S. Ct. 1491
Supreme Court of the United States (2014)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 188 L. Ed. 2d 374 · 571 U.S. 1236 · 82 U.S.L.W. 3508
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Warger v. Shauers., 135 S. Ct. 521 (U.S. 2014)…rlington N.R.,812 F. 2d 482, 485 (C.A.9 1987)("Statements which tend to show deceit during voir dire are not barred by [Rule 606(b)]"), and Maldonado v. Missouri P.R. Co.,798 F. 2d 764, 770 (C.A.5 1986)(same). We granted certiorari, 571 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 1491, 188 L.Ed.2d 374 (2014), and now affirm. II We hold that Rule 606(b)applies to juror testimony during a proceeding in which a party seeks to secure a new trial on the ground that a juror lied during voir dire. In doing so, we simply accord Rule 606(…
-
Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk, 135 S. Ct. 513 (U.S. 2014)
-
Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers Dist. Council Constr. Industrypension Fund, 135 S. Ct. 1318 (U.S. 2015)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence