DON EARL PRICE, PETITIONER,
v.
TEXAS.
DON EARL PRICE, PETITIONER,
TEXAS.
134 S. Ct. 1547
Supreme Court of the United States (2014)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 188 L. Ed. 2d 565 · 572 U.S. 1020 · 82 U.S.L.W. 3550
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cannon v. State, 180 So. 3d 1023 (Fla. 2015)…y of the evidence against him or not, this Court has a mandatory obligation to independently determine whether there was sufficient evidence to- sustain the jury’s verdict. See Kalisz v. State, 124 So. 3d 185, 214 (Fla.2013), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 1547, 188 L.Ed.2d 565 (2014); Wheeler v. State, 4 So. 3d 599, 605 (Fla.2009). “Whether the evidence is sufficient is judged by whether it is competent and substantial.” Phillips v. State, 39 So. 3d 296, 308 (Fla.2010). However, if the State’s evidence o…
-
Jordan v. State, 176 So. 3d 920 (Fla. 2015)…is due process rights and section 921.141(7), Florida Statutes. We disagree. “A trial court’s decision to admit victim impact testimony is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” Kalisz v. State, 124 So. 3d 185, 211 (Fla.2013), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 1547, 188 L.Ed.2d 565 (2014). We have stated the following with regard to the use of. victim .impact statements and their admissibility: In Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 111 S.Ct. 2597, 115 L.Ed.2d 720 (1991), the United- States Supreme Court held t…