DOUGLAS PAUL WALBURG, PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL R. NACK.
DOUGLAS PAUL WALBURG, PETITIONER,
MICHAEL R. NACK.
134 S. Ct. 1539
Supreme Court of the United States (2014)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 188 L. Ed. 2d 581 · 572 U.S. 1028 · 82 U.S.L.W. 3551
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mais v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc., 768 F.3d 1110 (11th Cir. 2014)…A.” CE Design, Ltd. v. Prism Bus. Media, Inc., 606 F. 3d 443, 450 (7th Cir.2010) (quoting United States v. Dunifer, 219 F. 3d 1004, 1008 (9th Cir. 2000)); see Nack v. Walburg, 715 F. 3d 680, 685 (8th Cir.2013), cert, denied, — U.S.—, 134 S.Ct. 1539, 188 L.Ed.2d 581 (2014). In explaining the reach of the Hobbs Act, the Supreme Court has instructed that, “[a]bsent a firm indication that Congress intended to locate initial APA review of agency action in the district courts, we will not presume that Congress int…
-
Jennings v. Stephens, 135 S. Ct. 793 (U.S. 2015)