LG ELECTRONICS, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS,

v.

INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Jones v. Waffle House, Inc., 866 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2017)
  …ed. “[R]equir[ing] the courts to -examine and, to a limited extent, construe the underlying agreement,” InterDigital Commc’ns, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 718 F. 3d 1336, 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (quotations omitted), vac’d on other grounds by — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 1876, 188 L.Ed.2d 905 (2014), as the wholly groundless exception does, runs counter to the Supreme Court’s mandate. Either the parties have evinced an intent to arbitrate gateway issues, or they have not. It’s not for the courts to say the parties really…
• Azar v. Rochelle Garza ad litem to unaccompanied minor J.D., 138 S. Ct. 1790 (U.S. 2018)
  …And although not every moot case will warrant vacatur, the fact that the relevant claim here became moot before certiorari does not limit this Court's discretion. See, e.g., LG Electronics, Inc. v. InterDigital Communications, LLC, 572 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 1876, 188 L.Ed.2d 905 (2014) (after the certiorari petition was filed, respondents withdrew the complaint they filed with the International Trade Commission); United States v. Samish Indian Nation, 568 U.S. 936, 133 S.Ct. 423, 184 L.Ed.2d 253 (2012) (aft…