VIRGILIO BERRIOS-RAMIREZ, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES.

U.S. | 2014-04-21
No. 13–8203.
134 S. Ct. 1876 Supreme Court of the United States (2014) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 188 L. Ed. 2d 917 · 572 U.S. 1063 · 82 U.S.L.W. 3609
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jones v. Waffle House, Inc., 866 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2017)
    …ed. “[R]equir[ing] the courts to -examine and, to a limited extent, construe the underlying agreement,” InterDigital Commc’ns, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 718 F. 3d 1336, 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (quotations omitted), vac’d on other grounds by — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 1876, 188 L.Ed.2d 905 (2014), as the wholly groundless exception does, runs counter to the Supreme Court’s mandate. Either the parties have evinced an intent to arbitrate gateway issues, or they have not. It’s not for the courts to say the parties really…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw