GABRIEL H. ACOSTA, PETITIONER,
v.
DARRYL B. DREW, WARDEN.

U.S. | 2014-05-19
No. 13–8186.
134 S. Ct. 2289 Supreme Court of the United States (2014) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 189 L. Ed. 2d 178 · 572 U.S. 1118 · 82 U.S.L.W. 3672
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Nivis Martin, 803 F.3d 581 (11th Cir. 2015)
    …ee United States v. Stargell, 738 F. 3d 1018, 1022 (9th Cir.2013) (“The increased risk of loss presented by fraudulent terms is sufficient to ‘affect’ a financial institution [in the context of wire fraud].”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2289, 189 L.Ed.2d 178 (2014); United States v. Serpico, 320 F. 3d 691, 694-95 (7th Cir.2003) (same). The second wire fraud count (Count 5) involved Martin’s purchase of the Beach House, where she and her ex-husband applied for and received mortgages from LoanCity, Inc.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw