OGLE
v.
LEE
The Court were unanimously of opinion, that they could only consider the single question upon which the judges below divided in opinion;1 but that the parties will not be precluded from bringing a writ of error upon the final judgment below; and the whole cause will then be before the court. A court may at any time reverse an interlocutory decree.
The case was afterwards settled by the parties.
If the whole case be sent up, the cause will be remanded. Saunders v. Gould, 4 Pet. 392; Harris v. Elliott, 10 Id. 25: Adams v. Jones, 12 Id. 207; Dennistoun v. Stewart, 18 How. 565; Daniels v. Rock Island Railroad Co., 350. Neither can the whole case be broken up into points, some of which may never arise. Nesmith v. Shelden, 6 How. 41; Luther v. Borden, 7 Id. 1; Webster v. Cooper, 10 Id. 54. But see United States v. Chicago, 7 Id. 185.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Griffin v. Orman, 9 Fla. 22 (Fla. 1860)
-
State v. The Cnty. Comm'rs of Jefferson Cnty., 20 Fla. 425 (Fla. 1884)
-
United States v. Am. Trucking Ass'ns, Inc., 310 U.S. 534 (U.S. 1940)…“But no general rule can be laid down upon this subject, further than that that exposition ought to be adopted in this, as in other cases, which carries into effect the true intent and object of the legislature in the enactment.” Pennington v. Coxe, 2 Cranch 33, 59; James v. Milwaukee, 16 Wall. 159, 161; Atkins v. Disintegrating Co., 18 Wall. 272, 301; White v. United States, 191 U. S. 545, 551; Ozawa v. United States, 260 U. S. 178, 194; United States v. Stone & Downer Co., 274 U. S. 225, 239; Gulf States…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Nesmith v. Sheldon, 6 How. 41 (U.S. 1848)
- Saunders v. Gould, 4 Pet. 392 (U.S. 1830)
- Dennistoun v. Stewart, 18 How. 565 (U.S. 1855)