ALFRED TRACY, SURVIVING PARTNER OF EDWARD TRACY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
WILLIAM HOLCOMBE
ALFRED TRACY, SURVIVING PARTNER OF EDWARD TRACY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
WILLIAM HOLCOMBE
24 How. 426
Supreme Court of the United States (1860)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 16 L. Ed. 742 · 1860 U.S. LEXIS 423 · SCDB 1860-052
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.
This case has been brought here by a writ of error directed to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. But upon looking into the transcript, it appears that the judgment which it is proposed to revise is a judgment reversing the decision of the court below, and awarding a new trial. There is, therefore, no final judgment in the case, and the writ must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Haseltine v. Cent. Bank OF Springfield, 183 U.S. 130 (U.S. 1901)…dismissed. A similar case is that of Great Western Telegraph Co. v. Burnham, 162 U. S. 339. This writ of error is therefore dismissed upon the authority of Brown v. Union Bank of Florida, 4 How. 465; Pepper v. Dunlap, 5 How. 51; Tracy v. Holcombe, 24 How. 426; Moore v. Robbins, 18 Wall. 588; St. Clair Co. v. Lovingston, 18 Wall. 628; Parcels v. Johnson, 20 Wall. 653; Baker v. White, 92 U. S. 176; Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 3; Johnson v Keith, 117 U. S. 199. Dismissed.…
-
United States v. Beatty, 232 U.S. 463 (U.S. 1914)…, it puts at large the principal matter in controversy and refers it to the District Court for solution in the mode indicated. It is therefore essentially interlocutory and cannot be the subject of a writ of error from this court. Tracy v. Holcombe, 24 How. 426; Macfarland v. Brown, 187 U. S. 239; United States v. Krall, 174 U. S. 385; German National Bank v. Speckert, 181 U. S. 405, 409. If it be erroneous and ultimately operates prejudicially to the United States the latter may, of course, secure its cor…
-
Atherton v. Fowler, 91 U.S. 143 (U.S. 1875)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence