CONGDON, ET AL., AND TENNESSEE MINING COMPANY
v.
GOODMAN AND BLEDSOE

U.S. | 1862-12-01
2 Black 574 Supreme Court of the United States (1862)
Also reported at: 17 L. Ed. 257 · 1862 U.S. LEXIS 271 · SCDB 1862-003
Cited by 3 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Supreme Court dismissed a writ of error from the Tennessee Supreme Court's decision declaring void a sale and lease of school lands, holding that it lacked appellate jurisdiction because the case involved only questions of state law and state authority, with no rights claimed under the federal Constitution or congressional legislation.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY.

Mr. Chief Justice TANEY.

This writ of error is directed to the.Supreme Court of' Tennessee, and is brought to revise a decree of that Court which declared null and void a certain sale and lease of school lands in Polk County, under which sale and lease the plaintiffs in error claimed title to these lands.

The statement of the facts in the transcript will show that the validity of this sale and lease depended altogether upon the 'laws of the State, and the proceedings of the State authorities. The plaintiffs in error do not claim under any laws of Congress, ór any authority exercised by the United States. On the contrary, they deny the authority of Congress to pass the Act of 1843, (which is the only Act of Congress referred to,) and claim that a lease for ninety-nine years, made by the School Commissioners under a law of the State, was valid, and passed the title for the term, although in direct opposition to the provisions of the Act of Congress. Such a controversy, where no right is claimed under the Constitution of laws of ,the United States, is exclusively within-the jurisdiction of the State Court, and this Court has no appellate power over its judgment. This writ must therefore be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw