MESA
v.
THE UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1862-12-01
2 Black 721 Supreme Court of the United States (1862) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 17 L. Ed. 350 · SCDB 1862-037 · 1862 U.S. LEXIS 286
Cited by 9 cases
Per_curiam
PER CURIAM.

[*722] PER CURIAM.

Let this appeal be dismissed. It has not been prosecuted in tbe manner directed nor within the time limited by the Act of Congress, which requires that the transcript shall be filed at the next succeeding term after the appeal is taken

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134 (U.S. 2012)
    …led with the Court “before the end of the term next succeeding the issue of the writ.” Edmonson v. Bloomshire, 7 Wall. 306, 309 (1869). The Court routinely dismissed cases that did not comply with that requirement. See, e. g., Mesa v. United States, 2 Black 721, 722 (1863) (per curiam); Edmonson, supra, at 309-310; Steamer Virginia v. West, 19 How. 182, 183 (1857). The same jurisdictional treatment was accorded to failure to serve notice on the defendant in error within the succeeding Term, see, e. g., Uni…
  • Grigsby v. Purcell, 99 U.S. 505 (U.S. 1878)
  • Rubber Co. v. Goodyear, 6 Wall. 153 (U.S. 1867)

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw