GORDON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• Ashwander v. Tenn. Valley Auth., 297 U.S. 288 (U.S. 1936)
  …pburn v. Griswold, 8 Wall. 603, 610; Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, 261. U. S. 525, 544;. Holmes, J., in Blodgett v. Holden, 275 U. S. 142, 147-148. E. g., Hayburn’s Case, 2 Dall. 409; United States v. Ferreira, 13 How. 40; Gordon v. United States, 2 Wall. 561, 117 U. S. 697; Musk rat v. United States, 219 U. S. 346; Willing v. Chicago Auditorium Assn., 277 U. S. 274. E. g., Ex parte Randolph, 20 Fed. Cas. No. 11,558, pp. 242, 254; Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge, 11 Pet. 420, 553; TradeMark Cases,…
• Carlson v. Green, 446 U.S. 14 (U.S. 1980)
  …e guise of exercising its authority to fashion appropriate relief, creates expansive damages remedies that have not been authorized by Congress. Just as there are some tasks that Congress may not impose on an Art. III court, Gordon v. United States, 2 Wall. 561 (1865); United States v. Klein, 13 Wall. 128 (1872), there are others that an Art. Ill court may not simply seize for itself without congressional authorization. This concern is initially reflected in the notion that federal courts do not have the a…
• Schneiderman v. United States, 320 U.S. 118 (U.S. 1943)
  …der and happiness of the United States because he believed in and advocated general resort to illegal action, other than force and violence, as a means of achieving political ends. Cf. United States v. Ferreira, 13 How. 40; Gordon v. United States, 2 Wall. 561; Id., 117 U. S. 697; United States v. Jones, 119 U. S. 477; Pocono Pines Assembly Hotels Co. v. United States, 73 Ct. Cls. 447; 76 Ct. Cls. 334; Ex parte Pocono Pines Assembly Hotels Co., 285 U. S. 526.…