RAY
v.
LAW

U.S. | 1805-03-05
3 Cranch 179 Supreme Court of the United States (1805) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 2 L. Ed. 404 · 1805 U.S. LEXIS 250 · SCDB 1805-019
Cited by 49 cases
Opinion of the Court
Marshall, Ch. J.

Marshall, Ch. J.

We can do nothing, without seeing the record, and the papers offered cannot be considered by us as a record. „ _ *The court, however, is of opinion, that a decree for a sale under a -* mortgage, is such a final decree as may be appealed from. We suppose, that when the court below understands that to be our opinion, it will .allow an appeal, if it be a case to which this opinion applies.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

  • Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 (U.S. 1962)
    …thereto.” When considered in light of the District Court’s opinion, this reservation emerges as much more than a mere retention of jurisdiction for the purpose of ministerially executing a definite and precise final judgment. See, e. g., Ray v. Law, 3 Cranch 179; French v. Shoemaker, 12 Wall. 86, 98. In light of this Court’s remarks in United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 353 U. S. 586, 607-608, the District Court concluded that the particular form which the divestiture order was to take was a m…
  • La Bourgogne, 210 U.S. 95 (U.S. 1908)
  • McGOURKEY v. Toledo & Ohio Cent. Ry. Co., 146 U.S. 536 (U.S. 1892)

Previewing 3 of 24 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw