EX PARTE DE GROOT
EX PARTE DE GROOT
6 Wall. 497
Supreme Court of the United States (1867)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 18 L. Ed. 887 · 1867 U.S. LEXIS 996 · SCDB 1867-074
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court.
The party has mistaken his remedy, if he has any, which is by writ of error to the court below to reverse the judgment there rendered in the case. The authorities are uniform on the question.*
*
Decatur v. Paulding, 14 Peters, 497; Kendall v. United States, 12 Id. 527; Brashear v. Mason, 6 Howard, 92; The United States v. Guthrie, 17 Id. 284.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States ex rel. Redfield v. Windom, 137 U.S. 636 (U.S. 1891)…great number and variety of cases before this court. Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 137; Kendall v. United States, 12 Pet. 524; Decatur v. Paulding, 14 Pet. 497; Brashear v. Mason, 6 How. 92, 101; Goodrich v. Guthrie, 17 How. 284; Ex parte De Groot, 6 Wall. 497; Georgia v. Stanton, 6 Wall. 50; Gaines v. Thompson, 7 Wall. 347; United States v. Seaman, 17 How. 225, 230; Ex parte Bradstreet, 7 Pet. 634; Harrington v. Holler, 111 U. S. 796; Reeside v. Walker, 11 How. 272, 290; United States v. Schurz, 102 U. S…
Authorities Cited
- Decatur v. Paulding, 14 Pet. 497 (U.S. 1840)