BRODERICK'S EXECUTOR
v.
MAGRAW
BRODERICK'S EXECUTOR
MAGRAW
8 Wall. 639
Supreme Court of the United States (1869)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 19 L. Ed. 531 · 1868 U.S. LEXIS 1137 · SCDB 1869-166
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
The CHIEF JUSTICE now gave the opinion of the court, to the effect that it was not necessary to examine the several questions presented by the record, for that the principles of the decision .just rendered required the affirmation of the judgment of the Supreme Court, and that it was
Affirmed accordingly.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
N. Ga. Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc., 419 U.S. 601 (U.S. 1975)…72. Mr. Justice Powell and Mr. Justice Rehnquist had taken their respective seats as Members [*617] of the Court five months before, on January 7. 404 U. S. xi-xvii. Fuentes had been argued November 9, 1971. See also Broderick’s Executor v. Magraw, 8 Wall. 639 (1870). Mr. Chief Justice Hughes described the result in the Legal Tender Cases as one of “three notable instances [in which] the Court has suffered severely from self-inflicted wounds.” C. Hughes, The Supreme Court of the United States 50 (1928).…