FARR
v.
THOMSON ET AL.
FARR
THOMSON ET AL.
11 Wall. 139
Supreme Court of the United States (1870)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 20 L. Ed. 102 · 1870 U.S. LEXIS 1466 · SCDB 1870-080
Cited by 24 cases
Opinion of the Court
The declaration in this case presented, in all substantial respects, the same state of facts as the declaration in the case just decided. After argument by Mr. M. M. Carpenter,for the plaintiff, no one appearing contra, Mr. Justice Swayne announced the judgment of the court to the effect that the former case decided this. The question certified to the.court — which was whether the declaration showed a sufficient cause of action — was accordingly answered by it
In the affirmative.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Bush v. State ex rel. Dade Cnty., 140 Fla. 277 (Fla. 1939)…of the owner is different from the home port, a vessel engaged in carrying commerce between a port of one State and a port or ports of another or foreign ports, is taxable at the residence of the owner. St. Louis v. Wiggins Ferry Co., 11 Wall. 423, 20 L. Ed. 102; Ayer & Lord Tie Co. v. Kentucky, 202 U. S. 409, 50 L. Ed. 1082, 26 Sup. Ct. 679; Southern Pacific v. [*298] Kentucky, 222 U. S. 63, 56 L. Ed. 96, 32 Sup. Ct. 13; Tacoma Oriental Steamship Co. v. Tallant, 51 Fed. (2d) 359. “It is the inability of v…
-
South Dakota v. North Carolina, 192 U.S. 286 (U.S. 1904)
-
Cromwell v. Cnty. of Sac, 96 U.S. 51 (U.S. 1877)
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence