INSURANCE COMPANY
v.
HUCHBERGERS
INSURANCE COMPANY
HUCHBERGERS
12 Wall. 164
Supreme Court of the United States (1870)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 20 L. Ed. 364 · SCDB 1871-001 · 1870 U.S. LEXIS 1175
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
The CHIEF JUSTICE:
The court is of opinion that this writ of error can have been taken out only for delay. We affirm the judgment below with ten per cent.
Damages in addition to interest.
Note. — Two other judgments, given under like'circumstances, were affirmed with the same penalty.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. Stallard, 68 F.2d 237 (4th Cir. 1934)…7 F. 355, 20 A. L. R. 1159; Oshkosh Packing & Provision Co. v. Mercantile Ins. Co. (C. C.) 31 F. 200; Mack & Co. v. Lancashire Ins. Co. (C. C.) 4 F. 59; Huchberger et al. v. Providence Washington Ins. Co., Fed. Cas. No. 6,823, affirmed 12 Wall, 164, 20 L. Ed. 364; Wiede v. Ins. Co. of North America, Fed. Cas. No. 17,617; 26 C. J. 382; notes in 20 A. L. R. 1168 and 56 A. L. R. 390; Cooley’s Briefs on Insurance (2d Ed.), vol. 7, p. 5852. Of course, honest mistake will not avoid the policy; and to preclude reco…
-
Pollak v. Brush Elec. Ass'n of ST. Louis, 128 U.S. 446 (U.S. 1888)