O'NEALE
v.
LONG

U.S. | 1807-02-14
4 Cranch 60 Supreme Court of the United States (1807) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 2 L. Ed. 550 · 1807 U.S. LEXIS 366 · SCDB 1807-006
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Marshall, Ch. J.,

Marshall, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court, that there was error in this, that the court below did not instruct the jury as prayed by the defendant. He observed, that the judges did not all agree upon the same grounds, some being of opinion, that the bonds were void, by reason of the interlineation, and others, that they were vacated by the rejection of them by the magistrate, and could not be set up again, without a new delivery.

Judgment reversed, with costs.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cotten v. Williams, 1 Fla. 37 (Fla. 1846)
  • Stassi v. United States, 50 F.2d 526 (8th Cir. 1931)
    …o doubt of the right of a party to require the opinion of the eourt on any point of law which is pertinent to the issue, nor that the refusal of the eourt to give such opinion furnishes cause for an exception.’ Smith v. Carrington, 4 Cranch, 62, 71 [2 L. Ed. 550]. As afterwards more fully stated by Mr. Justice Story, ‘it is no ground of reversal that the court below omitted to give directions to the jury upon any points of law which might arise in the cause, when it was not requested by either party at the…
  • Martin v. Thomas, 24 How. 315 (U.S. 1860)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw