TOWN OF OHIO
v.
MARCY
TOWN OF OHIO
MARCY
18 Wall. 552
Supreme Court of the United States (1873)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 21 L. Ed. 813 · 1873 U.S. LEXIS 1329 · SCDB 1873-061
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice MILLER announced the judgment of the court, aeeirming the judgment below, because, upon the case as above given, there was nothing in the record which raised any question of law which this court could consider.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Martinton v. Fairbanks, 112 U.S. 670 (U.S. 1885)…of the trial, and the phrase ‘ rulings of the court in the progress of the trial ’ does not include the general finding of the Circuit Court, nor the conclusions of the Circuit Court embodied in such general finding.” See also Town of Ohio v. Marcy, 18 Wall. 552; Insurance Co. v. Sea, 21 Wall. 158; Jennisons v. Leonard, 21 Wall. 302; Tyng v. Grinnell, 92 U. S. 467; The Abbottsford, 98 U. S. 440; Otoe County v. Baldwm, 111 U. S. 1. The proposition that the general finding of the court in this [*674] case is…
-
Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Metro. St. Ry. Co., 157 U.S. 94 (U.S. 1895)
-
In re Maryanov (E.D.N.Y. 1927)…v. Wilson, 18 [How.] Id. 199 [15 L. Ed. 332]; Beebe v. Russell, 19 How. Id. 283 [15 L. Ed. 668]; Bronson v. Railroad Co., 2 Black, 524 [17 L. Ed. 347]; Thomson v. Dean, 7 Wall. 342 [19 L. Ed. 94]; St. Clair County v. Lovingsston, 18 [Wall.] Id. 628 [21 L. Ed. 813]; Parcels v. Johnson, 20 [Wall.] Id. 653 [22 L. Ed. 410]; Railroad Co. v. Swasey, 23 [Wall.] Id. 405 [23 L. Ed. 136]; Crosby v. Buchanan [23 Wall.] Id. 420 [23 L. Ed. 138]; Commissioners v. Lucas, 93 U. S. 108 [23 L. Ed. 822], It has not always been…