JONES ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES
JONES ET AL.
UNITED STATES
18 Wall. 662
Supreme Court of the United States (1873)
Caution
Also reported at: 21 L. Ed. 867 · 1873 U.S. LEXIS 1344 · SCDB 1873-094
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court,' to the effect that it was quite evident that the facts pleaded did not constitute any defence to the action, and that such being the settled law of the court it was not necessary to enter into any discussion rnf the question.*
Judgment affirmed.
*
United States v. Vanzandt, 11 Wheaton, 184; Bank of the United States v. Dandridge et al., 12 Id. 64; Dox et al. v. The Postmaster-General, 1 Peters, 318; United States v. Boyd et al., 15 Id. 187.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Campbell v. United States, 224 U.S. 99 (U.S. 1912)
-
Hart v. United States, 95 U.S. 316 (U.S. 1877)…ible for the laches or .the wrongful acts of its officers. Gibbons v. United States, 8 Wall. 269; United States v. Kirkpatrick, 9 Wheat. 720; United States v. Vanzandt, 11 id. 184; United States v. Nicholl, 12 id. 505; Jones et al. v. United States, 18 Wall. 662. Every surety upon an official bond to the government is presumed to enter into his contract with a full knowledge of this principle of law, and to consent to be dealt with accordingly. The government' enters into no contract with him that its offic…
-
German Bank of Memphis v. United States, 148 U.S. 573 (U.S. 1893)…80] Dox v. Postmaster-General, 1 Pet. 318, cases of lacbes- in failing to prosecute delinquent officers within a reasonable time; in Gibbons v. United States, 8 Wall. 269, to a case of alleged duress by a military officer; in Jones v. United States, 18 Wall. 662, to the negligence of the government in permitting a dishonest postmaster to remain.-in office; in Hart v. United States, 95 U. S. 316, to the negligence of an officer of the ÍTnited States in permitting the removal of distilled spirits from a disti…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Dox v. The Postmaster-General of the United States, 1 Pet. 318 (U.S. 1828)
- The United States against Vanzandt, 11 Wheat. 184 (U.S. 1826)