EXPRESS COMPANY
v.
WARE

U.S. | 1874-10-01
20 Wall. 543 Supreme Court of the United States (1874) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 22 L. Ed. 422 · SCDB 1874-059 · 1874 U.S. LEXIS 1444
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
The CHIEF JUSTICE

The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court.

We see no error in the charge, and cannot examine the evidence to ascertain whether the jury was justified in finding as it did upon the issues of fact.

Judgment affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Herencia v. Guzman, 219 U.S. 44 (U.S. 1910)
    …the court upon writ of error. As there was evidence proper for the consideration of the jury the objection that the verdict was against the weight of evidence or that the damáges allowed were excessive cannot be considered. Express Company v. Ware, 20 Wall. 543; New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company v. Winter’s Administrator, 143 U. S. 60, 75; Lincoln v. Power, 151 U. S. 436-438; Humes v. United States, 170 U. S. 210. Nor was any exception taken by the plaintiff in error to the instructions which…
  • New York v. Estill, 147 U.S. 591 (U.S. 1893)
    …the weight of the evidence. The. bill of exceptions states that it contains all the evidence offered in the'case on either side, and there was sufficient evidence to sustain the finding of the jury. Zeller v. Eckert, 4 How. 289; Express Co. v. Ware, 20 Wall. 543; Lancaster v. Collins, 115 U. S. 222; Chicago & Northwestern Railway v. Ohle, 117 U. S. 123. It was not necessary for the plaintiffs to show that the defendant had notice, at the time of the shipment, that the heifers were in calf, in order to .ren…
  • State of Mo. Ex rel. ST. Louis v. Taylor, 266 U.S. 200 (U.S. 1924)

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw