THE HOPE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PROVIDENCE

v.

BOARDMAN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., Ltd., 308 U.S. 165 (U.S. 1939)
  …tury of litigation in this Court finally • to confer on a corporation, through the use. of a fiction,3 citizenship in the chartering state for jurisdictional purposes. Compare Lafayette Ins. Co. v. French, 18 How. 404 with Hope Ins. Co. v. Boardman, 5 Cranch 57. Throughout, the mode of thought was metaphorical. The classic doctrine was that a corporation “must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty.” Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 13 Pet. 519, 588. Logically applied, this…
• Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168 (U.S. 1868)
• Gutierrez v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 373 U.S. 206 (U.S. 1963)
  …. McGrath v. Kristensen, 340 U. S. 162, 167-168; Ford Motor Co. v. Treasury Dept., 323 U. S. 459, 467 ; Matson Nav. Co. v. United States, 284 U. S. 352, 359 (admiralty case); Grace v. American Ins. Co., 109 U. S. 278, 283; Hope Ins. Co. v. Boardman, 5 Cranch 57; see Wheeldin v. Wheeler, 371 U. S. 812; Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U. S. 294, 305-306. Respondent contends that it is not liable, at least in admiralty, because the impact of its alleged lack of care or unseaworthiness was felt on the pi…