THE MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ALEXANDRIA
v.
JAMES YOUNG
THE MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ALEXANDRIA
JAMES YOUNG
5 Cranch 187
Supreme Court of the United States (1809)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 3 L. Ed. 74 · 1809 U.S. LEXIS 425 · SCDB 1809-016
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
February 28.
Cushing, J.
delivered the opinion, of the court i.s follows:
This court is of opinion that the inferior court was not bound to give a construction of the answer of Captain David Young to the second interrogatory (if the plaintiff below, as requested by the jury; and that it would be improper in this court to determine whether the inferior court ought or ought not to have granted the motion of the defend*ants below for a new trial, upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to evidence.
The judgment below is to be affirmed with costs.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fairmount Glass Works v. CUB Fork Coal Co., 287 U.S. 474 (U.S. 1933)…U. S. 398, 405-406. Contrast Reliance Coal & Coke Co. v. H. P. Brydon & Bro., 286 Fed. 827, 832, where the moving party was the defendant, against whom the verdict had gone. See e. g., Henderson v. Moore, 5 Cranch 11, 12; Marine Ins. Co. v. Young, 5 Cranch 187, 191; The “Abbotsford,” 98 U. S. 440, 445; Railway Co. v. Twombly, 100 U. S. 78, 81. In numerous cases no reference is made, in denying review, to the grounds for the motion. E. g., Barr v. Gratz, 4 Wheat. 213, 220; Brown v. Clarke, 4 How. 4, 15; Ke…1 / 2
-
Ry. Co. v. Twombly, 100 U.S. 78 (U.S. 1879)
-
Miller v. Md. Cas. Co., 40 F.2d 463 (2d Cir. 1930)…he state practice and decisions upon appeals are not relevant. Camp v. Gress, 250 U. S. 308, 317, 318, 39 S. Ct. 478, 63 L. Ed. 997. Judgment affirmed. Henderson v. Moore, 5 Cranch, 11, 3 L. Ed. 22 (1809); Marine Ins. Co., v. Young, 5 Cranch, 187, 3 L. Ed. 74 (1809); Barr v. Gratz’s Heirs, 4 Wheat. 213, 220, 4 L. Ed. 553 (1819); McLanahan v. Universal Ins. Co., 1 Pet. 170; 183, 7 L. Ed. 98 (1828); Parsons v. Bedford, 3 Pet. 433, 448, 7 L. Ed. 732 (1830); Zacharie v. Franklin, 12 Pet. 151,153,9 L. Ed. 103…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Resler v. Shehee, 1 Cranch 110 (U.S. 1801)
- Douglass & Mandeville v. McAllister, 3 Cranch 298 (U.S. 1806)