BROWNE AND OTHERS
v.
STRODE
BROWNE AND OTHERS
STRODE
5 Cranch 303
Supreme Court of the United States (1809)
Caution
Also reported at: 3 L. Ed. 108 · 1809 U.S. LEXIS 436 · SCDB 1809-001
Cited by 49 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (32 total)
-
Duckett v. State (Fla. 2026)
-
Romero v. Int'l Terminal Operating Co., 358 U.S. 354 (U.S. 1959)…tains no language which would include a suit by one alien against another, even where there might also be citizen defendants. For the constitutionality of a broader statute, at least under Art. Ill, § 2, cl. 1, subclause 8, see Hodgson v. Bowerbank, 5 Cranch 303. At the time of the commencement of petitioner’s suit, § 1331 read: “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions wherein the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value [*391] of $3,000, exclusive of interest and c…
-
Verlinden B. v. V. Cent. Bank of Nigeria, 461 U.S. 480 (U.S. 1983)…ns where the rule of decision may be provided by state law. This Court’s cases firmly establish that Congress may not expand the jurisdiction of the federal courts beyond the bounds established by the Constitution. See, e. g., Hodgson v. Bowerbank, 5 Cranch 303 (1809); Kline v. Burke Construction Co., 260 U. S. 226, 234 (1922). Within Art. III of the Constitution, we find two sources authorizing the grant of jurisdiction in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: the Diversity Clause and the “Arising Under”…
Previewing 3 of 32 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence