LEROY PASLEY, PETITIONER,
v.
GRANT SHOLK CONSTRUCTION CO. ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Fla. | 1972-11-30
No. 42741
ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur., ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.
270 So. 2d 20 Florida Supreme Court (1972) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • VAN DEN Bliek v. State, 281 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973)
    …PER CURIAM. The defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to vacate judgments of conviction for two escapes from the Osceola County Jail. This court, in State v. Benjamin, Fla.App.1972, 267 So. 2d 348, cert. dismissed Fla. 1972, 270 So. 2d 20, agreed with the decision in Brochu v. State, Fla.App.1972, 258 So. 2d 286, which held that in accordance with the law in effect at the time of the escape it was essential that the person so charged was a prisoner who had been “convicted and sentenc…
  • Rothrock v. Louie L. Wainwright, 286 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973)
    …offense at the time he escaped. Appellant’s contention that he could not be convicted of escape because he was in custody awaiting trial on another charge has merit. This court in State v. Benjamin, Fla.App.1972, 267 So. 3d 348, cert. dism, Fla., 270 So. 2d 20, and Van Den Bliek v. State, Fla.App.1973, 281 So. 2d 218 agreed with the decision in Brochu v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 258 So. 2d 286, which held that in accordance with the law in effect at the time of the escape, it was essential that the person so…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw