JAMES DOUGLAS BROOKINS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Adrianne Nolden v. Summit Fin. Corp., 244 So. 3d 322 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
-
Lockhart v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)…rop. Ins. Corp., 282 So. 3d 933, 935 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (trial court has discretion to refuse to consider counter-affidavit presented for first time on motion for rehearing of summary judgment as being too late); Taylor v. First Nat’l Bank of Miami, 270 So. 2d 379, 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972) (affirming exercise of discretion in denial of motions to vacate and for rehearing of summary judgment premised on movant’s counsel’s failure to attend original hearing, where no prejudice was shown other than absent counsel’…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)