ANTHONY E. MACK, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Preservation Of Error For Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
Defendant-appellant, Anthony Eugene Mack, seeks reversal of his conviction and sentence after being found guilty on the charge of carrying a concealed firearm. Two police officers stopped defendant after noticing a suspicious bulge in his right pocket. The officers seized a revolver from defendant and subsequently an information was filed charging him with carrying a concealed firearm in violation of F.S. § 790.01, F.S.A. Pursuant to the trial court’s adjudication defendant was sentenced to sixty (60) days in the Dade County Jail.
On appeal it is contended that the trial judge deprived defendant of a fair trial by repeatedly displaying a lack of neutrality toward defendant. No objections, however, were made at trial to any of the alleged incidents of misconduct. Since the errors complained of by defendant are *383not fundamental they cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. Dickenson v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 261 So.2d 561; Scarpati v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 335; Mahone v. State, Fla.App.1969, 222 So.2d 769; Worthington v. State, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 728.
Accordingly, the judgment and sentence herein appealed is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Scott v. State, 396 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…for corrective instruction, Foreman v. State, 47 So. 2d 308 (Fla.1958); Pegues v. State, 361 So. 2d 433 (Fla.1st DCA 1978); Flynn v. State, 351 So. 2d 377 (Fla.4th DCA 1977); McCrea v. State, 210 So. 2d 724 (Fla.3d DCA 1968); see also Mack v. State, 270 So. 2d 382 (Fla.3d DCA 1972), and the comments were not so pernicious as to cause us to recognize them as fundamental error; (2) the refusal of the trial court to give a specified, requested instruction is harmless when the instructions as a whole clearly and…
-
Shepherd A. Meggett v. State, 362 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Hill v. State, 133 So. 2d 68 (Fla.1961); Spencer v. State, 133 So. 2d 729 (Fla.1961); Scott v. State, 256 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971); Mack v. State, 270 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); State v. Bryan, 287 So. 2d 73 (Fla.1973); Lynch v. State, 293 So. 2d 44 (Fla.1974); Henderson v. State, 304 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Walker v. State, 330 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).…
-
Jones v. State, 582 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…te review alleged improprieties of a trial judge, an objection must be made contemporaneously with the prejudicial conduct or comments. Herzog v. State, 439 So. 2d 1372 (Fla.1983); Williams v. State, 305 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Mack v. State, 270 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). An examination of the record supports the State’s contention that the defendant did not make a contemporaneous objection to the alleged misconduct by the court sufficient to preserve the issue for appellate review. More important…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mahone v. State, 222 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
- Alton Glenn Dickenson v. State, 261 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- Scarpati v. State, 224 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
- Worthington v. State, 183 So. 2d 728 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)