HERMAN PHILLIPS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1972-12-12
No. 72-194
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
270 So. 2d 405 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1972) Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment and that the defendant's motion to dismiss was untimely.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was found guilty of robbery and sentenced to seven years in prison. He appealed, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and the denial …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty of robbery and sentenced to seven years in prison. On this appeal he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment and in addition urges that the court should have dismissed the cause pursuant to Rule 3.190 (c)(4), CrPR, 33 F.S.A.1

We have reviewed the record as required to decide the point addressed to the sufficiency of the evidence. The proof of appellant’s guilt is full and convincing. Davis v. State, Fla.App.1972, 3rd D.C.A., 267 So. 2d 85, filed October 10, 1972.

The second point does not present reversible error because appellant’s motion which was presented at the onset of trial was untimely. Nevertheless, we have considered the motion on its merits and find that the trial court would have been correct in denying the motion if it had been timely filed.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cataldo v. Rader & Assocs., 287 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 1973)
    …, the decision of the District Court of Appeal2 is quashed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith. It is so ordered. ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur. . 287 So. 2d 56 (Fla.1973). . 270 So. 2d 405 (Fla.App.3d 1972).…
  • Cataldo v. Rader & Assocs., 285 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
    …PER CURIAM. Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on December 5, 1972 (270 So. 2d 405) affirming the final summary judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, 287 So. 2d 63 by its opinion and judgment f…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw