HERBERT ANGEL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HERBERT ANGEL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
270 So. 2d 715
Florida Supreme Court (1972)
Caution
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
An appeal from the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in this cause, reported at 261 So.2d 198 (3 DCA Fla.1972), was accepted here because the court initially construed a controlling provision of the Florida Constitution under the facts as reported below, Art. V, Section 4(2), Florida Constitution.
The decision appealed is affirmed on authority of Florida Constitution, Art. V, Section 9(b) and Fla.Stat. Section 27.181 (3).
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, C. J, and ERVIN, CARLTON, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., and DREW, J. (Retired), concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Daniels, 389 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 1980)…rugs, or any conspiracy to commit any violation of the laws of this state relating to the crimes specifically enumerated above. The district court noted that its decision was in conflict with State v. Angel, 261 So. 2d 198 (Fla.3d DCA 1972), aff’d, 270 So. 2d 715 (Fla.1972). Petitioner the State of Florida would have us follow Angel. The state argues that since article V, section 17 of the Florida Constitution provides for the appointment of assistant state attorneys and section 27.181(3), Florida Statutes (…1 / 2
-
Daniels v. State, 381 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)…thorizing interception of wire communications by the Department of Criminal Law Enforcement. § 27.181(3), Florida Statutes (1975), gives the assistant all the powers of the state attorney. See State v. Angel, 261 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 3 DCA 1972), aff’d. 270 So. 2d 715.” It is well settled, therefore, that under Florida law an application authorized by an assistant state attorney is valid. [*713] However, appellants contend that the Federal statute15 governs all intercepts of wire communications; that although a…1 / 4
-
Charles B. "Chuck" Mitchell and Neil Phillip Ryder v. State, 381 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)…thorizing interception of wire communications by the Department of Criminal Law Enforcement. § 27.181(3), Florida Statutes (1975), gives the assistant all the powers of the state attorney. See State v. Angel, 261 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 3 DCA 1972), aff’d. 270 So. 2d 715. Finally, appellants contend that the trial court erred in denying in Case No. 77-1258 below their motion for discharge filed under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(a)(1) — the speedy trial rule. They contend that since more than 180 days had elapsed between th…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Angel, 261 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)