AURELIO MARTINEZ, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Mid-State Contractors, Inc. v. Halo Dev. Corp., 342 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)
  …, although desirable, is neither required nor can it form the basis of a denial of enforcement of an otherwise valid lien where the lienor substantially complies with the prescribed requisites. Cf. Adobe Brick and Supply Co. v. Centex-Winston Corp., 270 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Yell-For-Pennell, Inc. v. Joab, Inc., 243 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); George J. Motz Construction Corp. v. Coral Pines, Inc., 232 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970). As a caveat to this proposition, such liens, despite defects in…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Cont'l Cas. Co. & Saul J. Morgan Enters., Inc. v. Associated Plastics, Inc., 347 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
  …fication of the subject real property in its notice to owner. The evidence further reflects that Cohen after taking control of the project was adversely affected thereby. Associated’s reliance upon Adobe Brick and Supply Co. v. Centex-Winston Corp., 270 So. 2d 755 (Fla.3d DCA 1972) is misplaced because in Adobe there was only a slight mistake in the street address,3 otherwise the description was sufficient for the identification of the property. In contrast, both the address and legal description in the notic…
• Centex-Winston Corp. v. Crown Paint, Inc., 294 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
  …at. § 713.-08(4) (a), F.S.A., George J. Motz Construction Corp. v. Coral Pines, Inc., Fla.App.1970, 232 So. 2d 441; Yell-For-Pennell, Inc. v. Joab, Inc., Fla.App.1971, 243 So. 2d 438; Adobe Brick and Supply Co. v. Centex-Winston Corp., Fla.App.1972, 270 So. 2d 755. We have reviewed the record and have concluded that the appellant has failed to make a sufficient showing that it was adversely affected by the error on the notice to owner. Therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. Affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Gustafson, 258 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1972)
• Fisher v. State, 251 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)
• Smith v. State, 251 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)