MOTOR TRANSIT COMPANY
v.
LILA KING, ET VIR

Fla. | 1940-05-17
Terrell, C. J., Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur., Justice Whitfield not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
142 Fla. 767 Florida Supreme Court (1940) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 196 So. 192
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

After a careful inspection of the record in this case and due consideration of the able briefs and arguments which have been submitted in behalf of the respective parties, the Court is of the opinion that there is no error in the record and that the judgment of the court below should be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Justice Whitfield not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Mabry v. Knabb, 151 Fla. 432 (Fla. 1942)
    …PER CURIAM: This is our second consideration of this case. See Chicago Trust Company, et al., as trustee, v. Knabb, 142 Fla. 767, 196 So. 200, for fuller statement of facts. Chicago Trust Company employed Mabry, Reaves, and Carlton to foreclose a mortgage. Their fee for the foreclosure not having ben paid, they secured an equitable lien on the lands involved in the foreclosur…
    1 / 2
  • McGRIFF et ux. v. McGILL, 62 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 1952)
    …en the parties, including the award of money damages, in order to avoid multiplicity of suits. Bell v. Smith, 159 Fla. 817, 32 So. 2d 829, 175 A.L.R. 695; Tellerine v. Public Realty Co., Inc., 158 Fla. 556, 28 So. 2d 821; Chicago Trust Co. v. Knabb, 142 Fla. 767, 196 So. 200; Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Saffold Bros. Produce Co., 121 Fla. 833, 164 So. 681. The parties were before the court, the pleadings placed the question of damages in issue and evidence was taken. The lower court was authorized under t…
  • Horatio Little v. Kendrick, 152 Fla. 720 (Fla. 1943)
    …ted, and when given, as stated supra, adverse possession recognized by the statutes begins. See Wilkins v. Pensacola City Co., 36 Fla. 36, 18 So. 20, 26; Armstrong v. Wilcox, 57 Fla. 30, 49 So. 41, 131 Am. St. Rep. 1080; Chicago Trust Co., v. Knabb, 142 Fla. 767, 196 So. 200-204; Kilvert v. Clark, 152 Fla. 795, 10 So. (2nd) 795. Counsel for appellee points out that one of the heirs lived in the community where the homestead was located and the possession of the defendant below was open, adverse, visible, h…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw