M. L. WATSON AND P. L. WATSON
v.
PEPPER & COFFRIN, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a circuit court's decree, finding no errors in the lower court's decision after reviewing the record, briefs, and arguments.
The Florida Supreme Court found no errors in the circuit court's decree.
“it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree”
This quote directly states the court's finding regarding the lower court's decision.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case involved an appeal from a decree issued by a circuit court. The parties submitted the case to the Florida Supreme Court via a transcript of t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Review cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, *2ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur.
Buford, J., concurs in opinion and judgment.
Chief Justice Terrell and -Justice Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State ex rel. Bergin v. Dunne, 71 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 1954)…force a right which is conditional or incomplete by reason of th.e .failure of the relator to perfqrm conditions precedent-entitling,..him to the enforcement Of. the right. Lamb v. Harrison, 91 Fla. 927, 108 So. 671; Bourne v. Pentland, 143 Fla. 61, 196 So. 606; State ex rel. Hall v. Hildebrand, 124 Fla. 363, 168 So. 531. It will not lie. to compel the parties, against whom it is, directed t.o-do a vain or useless thing. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Magwood, 111 Fla. 190, 149 So. 29; McAlpin v. State, 155 Fl…