JOHN P. BROWN ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
THE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, A CORPORATION, APPELLEE
JOHN P. BROWN ET AL., APPELLANTS,
THE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, A CORPORATION, APPELLEE
271 So. 2d 777
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Brown v. Life Insurance Company of Virginia (Fla.App.1971) 249 So.2d 79.
RAWLS, Acting C. J., and WIGGIN-TON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carter v. State, 428 So. 2d 751 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)…r determination by the trial court. The jury is to play no role in the resolution of those issues. Brown v. State, 352 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Sheff v. State, 301 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), aff’d, 329 So. 2d 270 (Fla.1976); Kemp v. State, 271 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Chaney v. State, 237 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904, 91 S.Ct. 2205, 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971); see also Martin v. State, 100 Fla. 16, 129 So. 112 (1930). In the instant case, the proceeding before the tri…
-
Thomas v. State, 272 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)…tion, no hearing was requested on the motion until after the case had been called for trial. Under these circumstances, the appellant cannot complain that the cause was not continued in order to hear his motion. See Kemp v. State, Fla.App. 3rd 1973, 271 So. 2d 777; Dickenson v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 261 So. 2d 561. Appellant’s second point urging error upon the merits of the motion to suppress presents a factual question. Appellant’s argument is in effect that the evidence before the court was such that the…
Authorities Cited
- Brown v. The Life Ins. Co. OF Va., 249 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)