RODNEY WOOTEN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1973-01-22
No. 72-515
Per Curiam
271 So. 2d 812 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1973)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Appellant's convictions for breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor and petit larceny were affirmed because the judgments were supported by sufficient competent evidence.


Holding

The judgments of conviction for breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor and petit larceny are supported by sufficient competent evidence and no reversible error occurred.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was convicted of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor and petit larceny and sentenced to concurrent terms of five years…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of the crimes of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor and petit larceny1 and was sentenced to concurrent terms of five years and six months on the respective convictions.

He seeks reversal of the judgments and sentences on the ground that the court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal and his motion for a new trial because the state had failed to establish by sufficient evidence that defendant was guilty of the crimes charged.

We have carefully considered appellant’s contentions, in light of the record on appeal and briefs, and have concluded that the judgments of conviction are supported by sufficient competent evidence and that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Simmons v. State, Fla.App.1970, 236 So.2d 147; Wetherington v. State, Fla.App.1972, 263 So.2d 294. Therefore, the judgments and sentences appealed from are hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw