MARLIN REALTY CO., APPELLANT,

v.

GILL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co. v. Broward Cnty., 421 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
  …etermining the sufficiency of appraisal evidence at a taking hearing, the issue is whether the estimate of value was made in good faith and was based upon a valid appraisal. § 74.031, Fla.Stat. (1981), Valleybrook Developers, Inc. v. Gulf Power Co., 272 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973). The estimate of value, when deposited into the court registry, secures the landowner in his right to obtain full compensation for the property rights taken. §§ 74.051(2) and 73.071, Fla.Stat. (1981). The estimate does not establ…
• Fla. Power Corp. v. Gulf Ridge Council, 385 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)
  …This appeal followed timely. The trial court noted in its well-reasoned opinion that strict compliance with the law is required when public utilities exercise their statutory right of eminent domain. Valleybrook Developers, Inc., v. Gulf Power Co., 272 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973). The trial court continued: Once a condemning authority has decided that a taking is necessary, selects one of the alternatives available to it, and applies to a court for approval of the taking, the court’s role is then to assu…
• RED OAK Farm, Inc. v. City OF Ocala, 636 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
  …have held that certiorari is the proper procedure to review an order of taking in an eminent domain proceeding. Georgia Southern & Fla. Ry. Co. v. Duval Connecting R.R. Co., 203 So. 2d 612 (Fla.1967); Valleybrook Developers, Inc. v. Gulf Power Co., 272 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973). We have jurisdiction to review the denial of the motion to abate and the order of taking. The City argues that the two actions should be considered separate and distinct because they proceeded differently in the second action.…