RONALD GAY, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Henry v. State, 359 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 1978)
  …is answered in the negative and the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, is approved. It is so ordered. OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, ENGLAND and HATCHETT, JJ., concur. . 350 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) . In Stills v. State, 272 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973), the District Court of Appeal, First District, was presented with a situation closely analogous to the case sub judice. The court relied on Hedges v. State, supra, in reversing the trial judge because he did not reinstruct the ju…
• Bristow v. State, 338 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
  …ated charges should be complete on the subject involved and that the giving of the partial instruction failed to inform the jury fully and could lead to undue emphasis to the part given to the detriment of the part omitted. See also Stills v. State, 272 So. 2d 174 (Fla.lst DCA 1973). One of the dangers inherent in a partial instruction is the possibility of misleading the jury. It is the appellant’s argument that a partial instruction on self-defense is [*556] potentially even more misleading than no instruc…
• Dykman v. State, 300 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
  …ond and third degrees, as well as on manslaughter. The appellant objected and urged that the complete instructions to the jury be read under the rule stated in Hedges v. State, Fla. 1965, 172 So. 2d 824, and applied in Stills v. State, Fla.App.1973, 272 So. 2d 174 and Tamayo v. State, Fla. App.1970, 237 So. 2d 251. After the jury had been in the jury room for approximately five minutes, it was recalled by the trial court for the purpose of repeating the remainder of the instructions. It was established by tes…