FLOYD LEE WHITE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Bd. of Trs. of the Internal Improvement Tr. Fund v. Sand KEY Assocs., Ltd., 512 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 1987)
  …oting Burke v. Commonwealth, 283 Mass. 63, 186 N.E. 277, 279 (1933)). Our Second District Court of Appeal considered title to artificially caused accretions in Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund v. Medeira Beach Nominee, Inc., 272 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). In that case, accretion resulted from offshore wooden groins placed as part of a public beach stabilization program. The court rejected an argument to distinguish between natural and artificial accretions and awarded the accreted…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Point E. ONE Condo. Corp., Inc. v. Point E. Developers, Inc., 348 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
  …ue. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to resolve this issue in this proceeding.” See also Cragin v. Ocean & Lake Realty Co., 101 Fla. 1324, 135 So. 795 (1931), and Board of Trustees of Internal Improvement Trust Fund v. Medeira Beach Nominee, Inc., 272 So. 2d 209 (Fla.2d DCA 1973). Cf. Avila South Condominium Association, Inc. v. Kappa Corporation, 347 So. 2d 599 (Fla.), case no. 48,753, released March 31, 1977. The holding of the trial judge that Section 711.66(5)(e), Florida Statutes (1975), is inapplicab…
• Walton Cnty. v. Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc., 998 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 2008)
  …es reflect an attempt to balance the interests of the parties affected by inevitable changes in the shoreline. For instance, as the Second District explained in Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund v. Medeira Beach Nominee, Inc., 272 So. 2d 209, 212-13 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973), “[t]here are four reasons for the doctrine of accretion:” (1) [D]e minimis non curat lex; (2) he who sustains the burden of losses and of repairs imposed by the contiguity of waters ought to receive whatever benefits the…

  ← 1 / 2 →