CAROL ANN COLBATH, APPELLANT,

v.

WALTER N. COLBATH, JR., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• W.R. (Ray) Daniel, Jr. v. Canterbury Towers, Inc., 462 So. 2d 497 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …the property appraiser’s assessment may be judicially overturned only if there is no reasonable hypothesis to support it, has also been followed by the decision of the various district courts of appeal. Exchange Realty Corp. v. Hillsborough County, 272 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); Tampa Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Walden, 230 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969); Harbond, Inc. v. Anderson, 134 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961); Atlantic International Investment Corp. v. Turner, 383 So. 2d 919 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Hecht…
• Muckenfuss v. Miller, 421 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
  …necessary defendants in Deltona’s suit pursuant to section 194.181, Florida Statutes (1981). . See Straughn v. Tuck, 354 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1977); St. Joe Paper Co. v. Brown, 223 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1969); Exchange Realty Corp. v. Hills-borough County, 272 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972); Calder Race Course, Inc. v. Overstreet, 363 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). . The Department of Revenue had not issued guidelines pursuant to sections 195.032 and 195.062(1), Florida Statutes (1981), on how property sold pursuant…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Cassady v. Holt S. McKINNEY, 296 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)
  …y criteria. Palm Corporation v. Homer, Fla.1972, 261 So. 2d 822; St. Joe Paper Co. v. Brown, Fla.1969, 223 So. 2d 311; Escambia Chemical Corp. v. Fisher, Fla.App.1st, 1973, 277 So. 2d 307; Exchange Realty Corp. v. Hillsborough Co., Fla.App.2d, 1972, 272 So. 2d 534. While these decisions were based on § 193.011 (formerly § 193.021), dealing with non-agricultural realty, we find no significant differences in the statutory language of § 193.461 which would require a different rule.1 [*97] The testimony of Cassad…

Authorities Cited

• Arlander Williams v. State, 268 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 1972)
• Colbath v. Colbath, 268 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 1972)