HELEN GLORIA BERK, APPELLANT,
v.
EARNEST IRVING BERK, APPELLEE
HELEN GLORIA BERK, APPELLANT,
EARNEST IRVING BERK, APPELLEE
272 So. 2d 859
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1973)
Opinion of the Court
By this interlocutory appeal, the appellant seeks review of an order denying a motion for garnishment after judgment and granting a motion to quash same.
The appellant has not favored us with the original judgment, the motion for garnishment or the motion to quash. Therefore, we have no alternative but to affirm the action of the trial judge here under review. Best v. Barnette, Fla.App.1961, 130 So.2d 90; Santona-Nervia Corporation v. Publix Market, Inc., Fla.App.1962, 146 So.2d 394; Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. King, Fla.App.1968, 207 So.2d 294; Jones v. First National Bank in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.App.1969, 226 So.2d 834; Rule 4.2, subd. d, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Best v. Barnette, 130 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Ernestine A. King, 207 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
- Santona-Nervia Corp. v. Publix Mkt., Inc., 146 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)
- Jones v. The First Nat'l Bank IN Fort Lauderdale, 226 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)