STATE EX REL. DUVAL JEWELRY CO.
v.
SMITH

Fla. | 1964-07-01
No. 33509
166 So. 2d 755 Florida Supreme Court (1964) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

Prohibition denied without opinion.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Kelly v. The Honorable Wallace E. Sturgis, 453 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)
    …gitimatize a grand jury making an unfair commentary as to the actions or motives of a purely private citizen and Marko does not so hold. We do not read Rubin v. Interim Report of Dade County Grand Jury, 159 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964), cert. den., 166 So. 2d 755 (Fla.1964) to authorize a grand jury to depart from a standard of fairness relating to a private citizen and to make unfair and unnecessary comments as to a private citizen merely because that citizen might be incidentally involved as a complainant…
  • Gerrald W. Finley v. State, 168 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
    …f the legislature and cannot be regulated by rule. From our order denying their motion to quash, the appellees sought a writ of prohibition in the Supreme Court. The writ was denied in State ex rel. Duval Jewelry Co. v. Smith, Jr., et al., Fla.1964, 166 So. 2d 755. [*204] Rule 3.18 F.A.R. is a rule of construction defining a method of computing time, and our courts have applied the applicable statutes and rule uniformly. The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied. SMITH, C. J., and ALLEN, J., concur. . § 92…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw