PEDRO BARRUETA, PETITIONER,

v.

SEAFERRO COMPANY, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Grasland v. Taylor Woodrow Homes Ltd., 460 So. 2d 940 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …ey’s fees is a nonfinal order and cannot be the subject of a plenary appeal. If so, the case would appear to conflict with that court’s earlier opinion in Insurance Company of North America v. Welch, 266 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972), cert. denied, 273 So. 2d 77 (Fla.1973), which held that a judgment reserving only the right to award attorney’s fees was a final judgment. In Welch the court ruled that in an appeal from the later award of attorney’s fees it could not reach the substantive is [*942] sues decid…
• The Travelers Indem. Co. v. Hutchins, 489 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
  …ey’s fees is a nonfinal order and cannot be the subject of a plenary appeal. If so, the case would appear to conflict with that court’s earlier opinion in Insurance Company of North America v. Welch, 266 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972), cert. denied, 273 So. 2d 77 (Fla.1973), which held that a judgment reserving only the right to award attorney’s fees was a final judgment. In Welch the court ruled that in an appeal from the later award of attorney’s fees it [*209] could not reach the substantive issues decide…
• Gen. Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp., Ltd. v. Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, 390 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …of reasonable attorneys’ fees upon consideration of appropriate factors and expert testimony. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Davis, 411 F. 2d 244 (5th Cir. 1969); Insurance Co. of North America v. Welch, 266 So. 2d 164 (Fla.4th DCA 1972), cert. denied, 273 So. 2d 77 (Fla.1973). Additionally, we find no error in the award of pre-judgment interest. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Davis, 412 F. 2d 475 (5th Cir. 1969); Auto Mutual Indemnity Co. v. Shaw, 134 Fla. 815, 184 So. 852, modified on rehearing, 184 So. 860…